Skip to content

Published Date

January 1, 2004

This resource was developed as part of Linking Family History and World History by Linda Pomerantz.

This is probably a photograph commemorating the wedding of Jacob Sarfaty and Sara Elias, most likely taken in 1905. The person sitting between them is most likely Sara’s mother, but this is an example of an unverified inference.

A copy of a black and white photograph of a man and a woman standing, each with a hand on the shoulder of a third, presumably seated figure (the image cuts off at their chest).

 

To analyze this photograph, start with questions and observations about the photograph similar to those asked in the 1923 family photograph:

  1. How many people are in the photograph?
  2. How are they are arranged?
  3. What kinds of expressions are on their faces?
  4. Are they touching? Who is touching?
  5. Is there a “center” to the photograph? If so, who is at the center?
  6. What types of clothing are they wearing?

Comparative Analysis

  1. How do the answers to these questions differ from the answers for the 1923 photograph?
  2. How might we compare and contrast these two photographs?
  3. What new inferences might we draw from the comparison?

 

A black-and-white copy of a formal family portrait, with the family in dresses and suits and ties. Two parents and three children are standing around a seat, where three much younger children sit. A copy of a black and white photograph of a man and a woman standing, each with a hand on the shoulder of a third, presumably seated figure (the image cuts off at their chest).

Reflective Questions

  1. If you have two different primary source photographs, how do your two photos differ?
  2. How are they similar? (Hint: It would be helpful do draw a chart or graphic organizer to show the similarities and differences.)
  3. How does your comparative analysis increase your understanding of the history of the family you are researching?
Scroll To Top

Content Warning

This page contains words or ideas that might be offensive to modern readers. To maintain the accuracy of historical documentation, the content is reprinted in its entirety as it was originally published. This accurate reproduction of original historical texts therefore contains words and ideas that do not reflect the editorial decisions or views of the American Historical Association.