News Topic

Action Alerts, Advocacy & Public Policy, History Education

The American Historical Association calls on its members, and all Alabamians who believe in teaching honest history, to contact their state legislators and oppose House Bill 216 and its companion Senate Bill 99. These proposals would require the display of the Ten Commandments in public school history classrooms and promote a misleading account of American religious history.

If you write or call your legislators, consider drawing on the following evidence and examples:

  • The courts have already addressed this issue. In Stone v. Graham (1980), the Supreme Court struck down a nearly identical law, ruling that posting the Ten Commandments in classrooms serves no educational purpose. Recent efforts in Louisiana have also been blocked, triggering costly litigation that Alabama taxpayers would likely bear.
  • The Constitution does not support the bill’s claims. The founding document contains no reference to Christianity or the Bible and explicitly prohibits religious tests (Article VI). The First Amendment bars both establishment of religion and interference with free exercise.
  • Founding-era evidence underscores religious neutrality. The 1796 Treaty of Tripoli states that the US government is “not in any sense founded on the Christian religion,” and in 1802, Thomas Jefferson described the First Amendment as building a “wall between church and State.”
  • The bill misrepresents historical scholarship. The idea of a unified “Judeo-Christian tradition” is a 20th-century concept, not a framework used by the founding generation, who lived in a religiously diverse and often divided society.
  • It imposes ideology, not history. Labeling contested claims as “Historical Truths” substitutes political assertions for the consensus of historians and undermines students’ ability to engage in inquiry-based learning about the past.
  • It disrespects educators and wastes resources. AHA research (2022–24) found no evidence that Alabama teachers are distorting history or constitutional principles. Instead of inviting expensive legal challenges, state resources would be better spent supporting high-quality instruction and professional development.

Take action today: Contact your state representative and senator and urge them to vote no on HB 216 / SB 99.

The AHA has sent a letter to members of the Alabama State Legislature opposing HB 216 and SB 99. The full letter is reproduced below.


March 30, 2026

Alabama House of Representatives
Alabama State House
Montgomery, AL 36130

Dear Representative:

The American Historical Association strongly opposes House Bill 216 and its companion, Senate Bill 99. Like a similar bill introduced last session–which the AHA also opposed–HB 216 would require public schools across Alabama to display the Ten Commandments in history classrooms serving grades five through twelve, while promoting an oversimplified account of the American founding that does a disservice to the nation’s rich and compelling religious history.

The constitutional issues are clear. In Stone v. Graham (1980), the Supreme Court struck down a nearly identical Kentucky law, holding that posting the Ten Commandments in classrooms serves no educational purpose. More recent efforts in Louisiana have likewise been blocked in federal court setting off a series of procedural challenges. Section 5 of HB 216 insinuates that the decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton (2022), which focused on personal religious expression, might open room to overturn Stone v. Graham, but this is a matter for the courts. Passage of HB 216 would almost certainly invite costly litigation challenging long-settled constitutional precedent—at the expense of Alabama taxpayers.

The bill’s added language does not resolve these flaws. While it invokes Alabama’s excellent 2024 Course of Study: Social Studies, it incorrectly claims that displaying the Ten Commandments is “essential” to fulfilling those standards. It is not. Nor does the mandated display advance sound history instruction. This is as true today as when it was articulated in the majority opinion in Stone v. Graham more than four decades ago.

More troubling, HB 216 requires schools to present a distorted version of US religious history under the label “Historical Truths.” Its claims about the Ten Commandments and “Judeo-Christian tradition” do not reflect the consensus of historians, legal scholars, or the judiciary. The concept of a unified “Judeo-Christian tradition” is itself a 20th-century construction, not a guiding framework for the nation’s founding. Presenting it as such is misleading and ahistorical. Alabama students deserve history education that is accurate and consistent with professional standards.

The founding generation lived in a religiously diverse society shaped by denominational pluralism and deep theological differences. The Constitution reflects this reality, notably in Article VI’s prohibition on religious tests for public office. HB 216 imposes a rigid and ideologically driven interpretation of religion’s role in American history—one that risks infringing on students’ rights and misrepresenting the past.

The bill also unfairly impugns Alabama’s educators. AHA research conducted between 2022 and 2024 found no evidence to support claims that teachers routinely distort constitutional principles or prioritize personal views. On the contrary, history educators rely on professional training and peer-reviewed scholarship. Mandating the claims advanced in HB 216 undermines that expertise rather than supporting it.

HB 216 limits, rather than enriches, opportunities for meaningful study of the role of religion in American history. Students benefit from studying the history of the full diversity of American religious life—not from reducing it to a single text or tradition.

Founded in 1884, the American Historical Association is the largest membership organization of professional historians in the world, chartered by Congress to advance historical scholarship and promote the value of historical thinking in public life.

We urge you to reject HB 216. The costs of defending this legislation in court would be better invested in instructional materials and professional development that strengthen history education across Alabama.

Sincerely,

Sarah Weicksel
Executive Director