A New Perspective at Perspectives: Introducing Shatha Almutawa, Associate Editor
One of the missions of , and the AHA, is to bring history more fully into public discussions. We believe that there are very few, if any, topics that would not benefit from some historical context; our AHA Roundtables, a series that has appeared in the online version of , has asked historians to weigh in on Supreme Court decisions, election-year presidential debates, and higher education reform. These forums have proven popular with readers and contributors alike, and we hope to do more of them in the future.
This interest also explains why Shatha Almutawa’s résumé caught our attention when we were hiring an associate editor last year. Shatha is a former editor of , a publication of the University of Chicago Divinity School and the Martin Marty Center for the Advanced Study of Religion that does for religion what the AHA Roundtables do for history. In addition to editing articles that commented “on the events, agents, and trends in public life where issues of religion are writ large,” as it is phrased on the website, Shatha wrote columns that lent a historical perspective to the persecution of religious minorities in Iraq, anti-Islamic propaganda, and recent revolutions in the Middle East. Meanwhile, she furthered her study of the history of Judaism, completing her dissertation on a medieval secret sect in 2013.
In this issue of , Jan Goldstein discusses her visit with a family that relocated to China for teaching jobs; Shatha has first-hand experience with this phenomenon of global recruitment, having just completed a semester teaching at Qatar University in Doha. She is bringing to the magazine, and to AHA headquarters, a wealth of experience and a broad perspective.
I’m extremely pleased to see the list of names below ’ masthead grow. Editing is work that should be as collaborative as possible. The exchange between an author and an editor should be based on a shared vision of what the article can be, and that vision is always best defined by an extended dialogue, one that can be full of surprises and intellectual stimulation. The magazine works the same way. Each issue, the overall series of issues, and the general mission of the magazine are best defined by people with diverse interests that overlap frequently, but not too frequently. It’s because we value collaborative work that has an editorial board. But this board meets only once a month, and there’s something happening with every single day.
So it is my hope that readers will notice changes in the magazine in the coming months, both in terms of the kind of content and how it is framed, and from the new voice we’ve added prominently to our pool of collaborators.
Allen Mikaelian is editor of .
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Attribution must provide author name, article title, Perspectives on History, date of publication, and a link to this page.
Please read our commenting and letters policy before submitting.