 |
| Image courtesy of Touchstone Pictures / Photofest. |
Spielberg’s Lincoln has already engendered the kind of informed, critical engagement that I have hoped historians would offer upon its release: in this case, Kate Masur (Northwestern University) in the New York Times.
In my current column in AHA’s Perspectives on History, I “encourage colleagues to engage the film in the public realm—in newspapers and blogs and on the radio—in language that is accessible, and in a voice that speaks especially to people who might not readily accept concepts and perspectives taken for granted within the academy.” Professor Masur’s thoughtful critique opens this conversation and I look forward to more historians continuing the discussion, whether in print, digital, or broadcast media. Please send us a link so the AHA can publicize our members’ engagement with the film and the issues it raises.
This post first appeared on AHA Today.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Attribution must provide author name, article title, Perspectives on History, date of publication, and a link to this page. This license applies only to the article, not to text or images used here by permission.