Publication Date

September 1, 1988

Perspectives Section

From the National Coalition for History

Post Type

Advocacy & Public Policy

President Signs Reauthorization Legisla­tion for the NHPRC Grants Program

On July 13 President Reagan signed Public Law 100-865 which reauthorizes for the next five years the National Historical Publications and Records Commission’s grants program. This law establishes funding ceilings of $6 million for FY’89, $8 million for FY’90, and$10 million for FY’91, ’92, and ’93. The legislation also modifies the composition of the Commission by adding the Association of Documentary Editors and the National Association of Government Archives and Records Ad­ministrators. Currently, the Commission in­cludes two representatives from four organizations: the American Historical As­sociation, the Organization of American His­torians, the Society of American Archivists, and the American Association for State and Local History. This legislation adds two new organizations but reduces the number of repre­sentatives for each organization from two to one. Additionally, this legislation has clarified the authority of the NHPRC with provisions that specifically state a role for it in conducting institutes, training and education programs, and disseminating of information.

Frank Burke to Leave NHPRC

On Sep­tember 1 Frank Burke left the National His­torical Publications and Records Commission to accept a position at the University of Maryland College Park. For the past thirteen years he has served as the Executive Director of the NHPRC and for over two years of that time he served as Acting Archivist of the United States. Under his leadership, the NHPRC was responsible for the development of a guide to manuscript repositories and ar­chives, a national records program to provide assistance to the states for archives preserva­tion, and a large-scale program to assess the condition of records in the United States. Burke’s new position at the University of Maryland, entails teaching in the College of Library and Information Services as well as coordinating its History-Library Science Joint Degree Program. A national search is under­ way for a new Executive Director and the dead­line for applications is October 1. Roger A. Bruns, the head of the NHPRC Publications Program, is currently Acting Executive Direc­tor of NHPRC.

Access to Records of the House of Rep­resentatives

On June 15, the Subcommittee on the Rules of the House held a hearing to con­sider H. Res. 419, which would amend the Rules of the House to make noncurrent House records available to scholars after thirty years. Currently, House records are closed for fifty years. Four witnesses presented testimony: Don W. Wilson, the US Archivist; Donald Anderson, the Clerk of the House; Raymond Smock, Historian of the House of Repre­sentatives; and Bernard Weisberger, a public historian who has recently written a script for a film on the history of Congress and who rep­resented the NCC. Three of the four supported the adoption of a twenty-year rule, which has been the practice in the Senate for almost a decade. Only the C!erk of the House supported the thirty-year rule. Provisions in the Senate and House procedures give adequate protec­tion for national security and privacy; and thus a twenty-year rule could provide a balance be­ tween the needs for openness and confiden­tiality. Weisberger stressed that “Where ac­cess to records is denied, reputable scholars are reluctant to venture because their profes­sional standing depends on their objectivity and accuracy.” Immediately following the hearing the committee voted unanimously, without any discussion, to recommend a thir­ty-year rule. The fact that there are fifty-two members of the House who have served for over twenty years and who may prefer their earlier views not be scrutinized seemed to have been the underlying reason for the unanimous support by the Subcommittee of Rules for the thirty-year rule.

Freedom of Information Act Hearing

On August 2 the Senate Judiciary Subcommit­tee on Technology and the Law chaired by Senator Patrick Leahy {D-VT) held a hearing to consider the current procedures and ad­ministration of the FOIA. Senator Leahy opened the hearing by stating that for “the past eight years, this Administration has waged an assault on the FOIA with every weapon in its arsenal—executive orders, budget cuts, fee guidelines, and legislative proposals clearly designed to gut the FOIA.” For scholars one of the most disturbing issues is a fee waiver provision adopted in 1986. To qualify for a fee waiver, educational or scientific researchers must prove that a request “is being made under the auspices of a qualifying institution.” Individual historians initiate their own research projects. Generally academic institutions have no role in a historian’s selection of topics, research, or conclusions. The requirement that scholars make their requests on behalf of their universities reflects a lack of un­derstanding of much historical research. During questioning of the agency representatives from the Justice Department, State Department, and the Central Intelligence Agency, Senator Leahy addressed issues of the subjective interpretations by agency per­sonnel of whether fee waiver requests are “in the public interest” and explored a variety of bureaucratic obstacles designed to discourage use of the FOIA. Although no new FOIA legis­lation is expected any time soon, this hearing served to put the agencies on notice that Congress has serious reservations about current handling of the FOIA.

Librarians Oppose FBI Monitoring of Libraries

Recently the House Civil and Constitutional Rights Subcommittee, chaired by Representative Don Edwards (D-CA), held a hearing on the FBI’s “Library Awareness Program,” which seeks the voluntary cooperation of librarians in identifying foreign intel­ligence agents and in monitoring the use of technical and scientific information. All of the witnesses of the library community criticized this program which threatens the loss of basic rights of privacy and of access to unclassified, public material.

NEH Council

This summer the Senate confirmed five nominees for membership on the National Council on the Humanities: Alvin Bernstein, professor of history, Naval War Collegej Charles R. Ritchison, historian and university librarian at the University of Southern California; Patrick Butler, vice president of the Times Mirror; William P. Wright, businessman and chair, Texas Com­mittee on the Humanities; and Edwin Delattre, former president of St. John’s College and Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center. The three pending nominations awaiting con­ sideration by the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources are Gary McDowell, historian and former NEH employee who is a fellow at the Wilson Center; Hillel Fradkin, a foundation executive and scholar of Near Eastern languages and literature; and Donald Kagan, professor of history and classics, Yale University. Six Council members whose terms expired last January will continue to serve until replacements are confirmed. The National Council advises the Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities on policies, programs, and procedures and makes recommendations on grant applications.

Foreign Relations of the United States

Since 1861 the Department of State has published the official records of American diplomacy in a respected documentary series, The Foreign Relations of the United States. For many years volumes in the series were published twenty years after the historical events. Now there is little hope for meeting a thirty-year target. The NCC is working with leaders in the historical community to draw congressional attention to the problems cur­rently facing this series. Concerns focus not only on the delays but also on problems in the declassification process and on the appropriate role of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation.

Status Report FY’89 on Appropriations

Congress is working on appropriations bills, but none are yet ready to be sent to the President. Nevertheless, at this mid-point stage in the appropriation process, there are some interesting developments to report.

Although the administration recommended $118 million for the National Archives and zero funding for the NHPRC grants program, the House passed a bill that calls for $126 mil­lion for the National Archives. This includes $4 million for the NHPRC grants program, $4 million for construction at the Kennedy Library,   and $118 million for the National Archives’ operational budget. The Senate passed a bill that provides a total of $118 mil­ lion for the National Archives, which $4 mil­lion is earmarked for the grants program of the NHPRC. A Conference Committee will recon­cile the differences. Bath the House and the Senate bills authorize the Archivist to enter into contracts for construction of a new ar­chival building. Negotiations are proceeding for locating it adjacent to the University of Maryland College Park.

Rep. Sidney Yates (D-IL) has been in­strumental in securing a significant increase in the House budget for NEH for FY’89. The House bill would increase the current budget of $140 million to $154 million. Concerted at­tention to the needs of preserving brittle books boosted the line item for the NEH Preservation Office from its current level of $4 million to $12.5 million. The budget for the State Programs increased from $21 million to $25 million. If passed into law these increases would help to close the gap between funding far NEH and the National Endowment for the Arts. This year NEA’s budget is 16 percent larger than that of NEH. The budget approved by the House would reduce the gap to 10 per­cent. The Senate Appropriations Committee has recommended $144 million for NEH for FY’89, with almost all of the increase ear­marked for State Programs.

The House has approved a budget for FY’89 for the Historic Preservation Fund at $30 mil­lion with $24.7 million for the states and $5.25 million for the National Trust. The Senate Ap­propriations Committee has recommended $24.75 million for the states, $1 million for the special lighthouse project, and $4.5 million for the National Trust.

Page Putnam Miller
Page Putnam Miller

University of South Carolina