Publication Date

April 1, 1985

Perspectives Section

From the National Coalition for History

Post Type

Advocacy & Public Policy

Senate and House subcommittees are now setting dates for hearings on the President’s proposed budget. NCC will be coordinating efforts to assure that the concerns of the historical and archival community will be presented at these hearings. In addition to having public witnesses, it is very helpful if individuals and organizations contact the subcommittees and request that written state­ments, which may be in the form of a letter, be added to hearing record. Target the re­ceipt of statements for just prior to the hear­ing or for the two or three weeks following the hearing date. Four upcoming hearings of particular concern to historians  are: March 20—Hearing for public witnesses on FY’86 appropriation for the National Endowment for the Humanities by House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior and Related Agencies. The President has requested a 12 percent cut for NEH which would mean a reduction from the FY’85 level of $139.478 million to $126 million. Of particular con­cern is the recommended cut for state pro­grams, a reduction from the current $21.4 level to $16.8 million. To have a statement added to the hearing record write: Repre­sentative Sidney R. Yates, Chairman, Sub­committee on Interior and Related Agencies, US House of Representatives, Washington, DC 20515. April 23—Hearing for public wit­nesses on FY’86 appropriation for the Na­tional Historical Publications and Records Commission’s grants program by Senate Ap­propriations Subcommittee on Treasury, Postal Service and General Government. Al­though Congress passed reauthorization legislation for NHPRC grants program last year which called for a $5 million ceiling for 1986, the President has recommended zero fund­ing. The NHPRC has an outstanding record of using federal funds to stimulate private contributions for records preservation and documentary editing projects. Small pro­grams are particularly susceptible to reduc­tions and even elimination. Constituent work in the past on behalf of NHPRC has illustrat­ed that with some education, legislative aides and Congressional members quickly become supporters of this small but important pro­gram. To have a statement added to the hearing record write: Senator James Abd­nor, Chairman of Senate Subcommittee on Treasury, Postal Service and General Gov­ernment, US Senate, Washington, DC 20510. A date has not yet been set for the House hearing, but a letter could also be written to Representative Edward R. Roybal, Chairman, House Subcommittee on Trea­sury, Postal Service, and General Govern­ment, US House of Representatives, Wash­ington, DC 20515. April 30–May 16 in the House and May 1–14 in the Senate—Hear­ings for public witnesses on FY’86 appropria­tion for the Department of Education by Senate Subcommittee on Labor, Health, Hu­man Services, and Education. Two items of particular concern to historians are the zero funding for the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) and the sharp reduction recommended in student aid programs. FIPSE was established in 1972 to provide grants to stimulate improvements in higher education. Although the Adminis­tration concedes that FIPSE has been a suc­cessful program, the President has recom­mended elimination of the program. The Administration position is that colleges can now undertake these projects on their own. In FY’85 the appropriation for FIPSE was $12.7 million. In 1984 the Administration tried to cut the FIPSE budget in half, a move that Congress rejected. The higher educa­tion community must turn again to Congress for the necessary support for continuing this program. Indications are that there is consid­erable opposition in Congress to the sharp cuts proposed in student aid. Senator Robert Stafford (R-VT) who chairs the oversight subcommittee responsible for the Depart­ment of Education has called the Administra­tion’s recommended cuts “absolutely ridicu­lous,” and stated that “our middle-income families have not asked for a free ride from the federal government, only limited  assistance which the student will repay after leaving school.” To register concern over these appropriations and to have your statement included in the hearing records, write: Rep­resentative William H. Natcher, Chairman, House Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, US  House of Representatives, Washington, DC 20515 and Senator Lowell P. Weicker, Chairman, Senate Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services, and Education, US Senate, Washington, DC 20510.

Page Putnam Miller
Page Putnam Miller

University of South Carolina