To the Editor:
In the January issue of Perspectives, John Haynes accused me of portraying him as a “knave” in my article, “Moscow’s Archives and the New History of the Communist Party of the United States” (Perspectives, October 2000). While I had no intention of maligning Haynes’s motivations, the fact remains that we have a fundamental disagreement over how to interpret Communist Party archival sources. Haynes’s role as a major player in gaining the Library of Congress access to Moscow’s rich sources should be applauded. This act, however, does not mean that historians need to accept his one-sided interpretation of the sources—one that excludes local forces and the complex nature of American communism.
—
SUNY, Cortland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Attribution must provide author name, article title, Perspectives on History, date of publication, and a link to this page. This license applies only to the article, not to text or images used here by permission.